Sunday, July 19, 2020

Tips for Engaging Online in Faith Formation



         Faith formation in the parishes lag behind the rest of the public/private educational space when it comes to taking advantage of technology. Now, it’s all changed with the pandemic. Today, if we want to reach our faithful, we are forced to enter the online world. And this online world has turned to be a contentious place, and this year 2020 seems furious and destructive thanks to the internet, social media, twenty-four-hour news channels that constantly confuse with informations - both true and fake. In the midst of the devouring pandemic the physical dialogue is strained, persons are more reacting than responding.  There are lots of media talking, people are snarling, tossing labels with reckless indifference. It’s easy to sit behind screens that block us off  and we blast off pushing the post button, forgetting that there is a living person across with whom we share commonalities, someone who has been bullied, abandoned or neglected; has been victim of physical, sexual, or psychological abuse; endured loss, suffered privation, loneliness, self-doubt, depression, grief, failures, lack of encouragement, support, or nurturing love. Yet, we all have been loved by God who created us with a purpose and potentiality. Sometimes the social blocks thwarted the potential growth. Wars and restlessness may be going on within. This conscious realization should influence our online engagements going beyond our own concerns, passions and obsessive beliefs, and objectively be aware of the global human realities.
Here are few guidelines on how to engage with others online for creating and living within a healthy society. How do we facilitate a faith group online that focus on enabling the participants to live their faith than just learning about their faith. In place of meeting in person, how do we move into meeting online?  What skills does an online facilitator need? Here are few tips.


A. Listen
  1.   To listen with an intentional ear and pick up something beyond the noise, silence, frigidity, or a still voice that still speaks of wisdom.
  2.  To listen and not hear with subjective interpretation, prejudice, hasty judgement that mostly resound echo of our own thoughts.
  3.  To “Listen with the ear of the heart” (St. Benedict)[1], so that what you listen to, helps you “to inform your understanding”
  4.  To avoid talking too much.
  5.  To avoid responding always with “churchy” answers to all the questions they ask
  6.  To know when to encourage someone to speak more
  7.  To know when to keep someone from hogging the conversation by “gatekeeping.”
  8. To summarize what participants are saying and use that as a springboard to move onto something new.
  9.  To charge your thinking, change it, change your words for better understanding.



B.     Accept ALL as they are, as Christ accepts

  1.     To trust in the wisdom of the group and the presence of Christ in each of the members of the group.
  2.       .   To engage the other with respect, honor and dignity.
  3.          To acknowledge the God-values and Creative-Spirit within each one.
  4.          To recognize that ALL are equal-in-God, - a foundational human commonality.
  5.      To consider all those who share Christian faith (Gal. 6:10) as well as ‘others’ as pilgrims journeying together,  thus embodying the life-in-Christ to others.
  6.          To invite everyone to come with their gifts and allow a feast to come out of it


C.    Be a bit humble and simple
1.      To avoid being a know-it-all facilitator.
2.      To be frank, honest and willing to confess own weakness and ignorance.
3.      To admit mistakes done, or misunderstood, and apologize, for the consequences fell on others.
4.      To believe we are not the best, that we need less of praise, notice, or try to project the self as know-all-stuff.
5.      To speak up, gently, succinctly, without raising our voices, thus getting past an initial reaction to a more thoughtful response, if it is necessary at all.

D.    Joy, Youthfulness and Laughter

1.      To laugh, but guard against using false humour at the expense of another, to debase, or to dismiss.
2.      To avoid sarcasm and jokes that are dishonest and unclean.
3.      To shower mercy and joy through shared laughter on what is beautiful, good, and true,
4.      To offer all of the participants a sense of unconditional positive regard.
5.      To celebrates the other, by being a great ‘joiner of souls and healer of rifts’.

E.     Run the Way of the Lord.
1.      To ‘run on the path of God’s commandments’ (Ps 119:32), making our hearts overflow “with the inexpressible delight of love.”
2.      To think on how Jesus would facilitate a group.
a.       When he argued with Pharisees and showed pity on those who were sheep without a shepherd, he wasn’t known for saying, “I’m sorry, Peter and John, but you’re just wrong; let me [teach you] something’ about God and truth.” Instead Jesus asked questions of those who were with him. Think of his first encounter with Bartimaeus when he asked, “What do you want me to do for you?”
b.       Jesus invited others to be with him and have dinner with him (e.g. Last Supper.), and he said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life.”
3.      To invite them like Jesus, into a process of discovery in finding “the way.”
4.      To take breaks through occasional internet “fasts” from FB, Youtube, Whatsapp etc.
5.      To replace them with reading of Scripture, lives of the saints, instructive treatises and novels, to increase one’s point of view and refresh the mind and soul
6.      To re-enter the fray energized with a healthier frame of mind and body.
7.      To restore the health of our society by reason, religion and loving kindness.

F.     Use a “language of mystery” with poetry and beauty in hearts:

1.      To act not as teachers of a subject but facilitators of an encounter to deliver the content.
2.      To create a climate of prayer by a conducive background in the room.
3.      To employ a language of mystery through colour, background display, quotation, etc.
4.      To utilize: music/singing, silence, storytelling, sign and symbol, charts, ppt presentation, board, movement and gesture, sacred space, ritual, and works of mercy.
5.      To trust that participants have as much faith in God as you have and allow them to share it.

G.    Technique to lead the group in productive ways.

1.      To invite others to share their own answers to the question presented
2.      To admit if I don’t know something and promise to get back to the person later with a response.
3.      To know that they are not always interested in answers;
4.      To invite them to their vulnerability and that they aren’t the only one who struggles
5.      To fulfill their desire to connect and feel connected to others in their faith.
6.      To make it a journey into the process of coming closer to God and not a class, nor a lecture, nor a chore.


H.    Demonstration: e.g. Having an online book discussion group  

This can be part of an adult faith formation programs in the parish over a video conferencing through Zoom call.
1.      Not needed to invent new content or new approaches; just begin doing what you do during a personal call on the Internet.
2.      Participants with their computers/ smartphone/ tab participate for one and a half hours.
3.      Doing a pattern of six-week modules each for Lent, Easter, Advent, and same between Sept-Oct, New Year to Lent, and six weeks after Easter

I.       Format for an Online Session

1.      Everyone checks in with each other.
2.      One person is selected to give an update on the week and invites everyone to do the same through a group discussion.
3.      Person who speaks chooses the next speaker until everyone shares. (“popcorning,” with effects on power structures in multicultural groups as well as equalizing gender differences. (See Mutual Empowerment Method in Eric Law, The Wolf Shall Dwell with the Lamb)
4.      Then pray on anything that was noted in the check-in: a birthday, an anniversary, a parent who is ill. Thus exploring group’s energy and experience
5.      Begin to discuss the book reading for the week and identify any strengths that we saw.
6.      Use the same technique as used in the check-in, allowing everyone to speak.
7.      Provide a 10-minute prepared observation about the reading in order to go in depth on one or more of the subjects.
8.      Everyone discusses what they think of that prepared observation.
9.      Close with a “check-out” just like the check-in, along with the basic question: What are you taking away from this evening? It might be something from the book, it might be something that the presenter said, something that a fellow member of the group said. It builds a real sense of affirming the goodness and faith in one another that takes hold of the group when done in a trusting and supportive environment.

J.      How to interact and follow protocol ?

1.      A video conference has to have clear rules.
2.      Poorly run video conferences lead to a draining of energy and time.
3.      Have a clear and empowering way to hold a meeting, especially on Zoom.[2] 
4.      Remind when someone finishes speaking to pick the next speaker …
5.      Always have a prayer moment at the beginning but we wait until everyone has checked in.

K.    What challenges are faced doing an online group?

1.      Empowering participants to stay engaged.
2.      The above methodology forces people to stay engaged.
3.      Participants don’t know if they will be picked next.
4.      All form part of the conversation, waiting for their unexpected turns, while developing a trust.
5.      Participants feel quite close to one another and supportive, and wait eagerly for the next meet.







[1] Cf. Elizabeth Scalia, Engaging Online: Five Tips From St. Benedict, Word on Fire Blog, July 14, 2020.

[2] Cf. Joe Paprocki,  Facilitating a Small Group Online: St. Andrew Parish in Chicago, https://catechistsjourney.loyolapress.com/2020/07/facilitating-a-small-group-online-st-andrew-parish-in-chicago/, 17.7.2020



Wednesday, July 15, 2020

Sentimental Pietism




Human beings as rational and irrational creatures look for proof to validate its beliefs. To do so, they go beyond the basics to meet their personal need by ‘transmitting their faith’ to other persons – faith that is a free gift of God!  How can one ‘transmit’ faith through streaming of online Mass or other liturgical and sacramental celebrations over video/ppt/tiktok formats? As tools they can only help experience phenomenon of religious expressions. Faith is a personal adherence and witness to the person of Jesus. According to St. John of the Cross what is needed most is being with God, and not chasing after some supernatural phenomena just for an experience of God. Knowing God is not same as knowing about God – one is of the head-cum-heart and the other, of the head alone.

In the field of faith and belief system, we tend to speak in pleasantly emotive sentimental terms. Out of sympathy, we often soften the truth.  Recently, there is the current cultural tendency to invent and redefine words closely connected to sentimentalities detached from faith and reason. These are ‘inventions’ of ideologues to redefine words for cultural subversion. The popular meaning of ‘popular pietism’ or ‘sentimental pietism’ for example, is interpreted, with hermeneutics of continuity and not rapture with the past sentimental superstitious practices. Many such terms and phrases deliberately distort and deny reality. The declining practice of the Catholic faith in the churches is a fact too hard to bear. So, when a diocese shuts its church doors, either due to the pandemic Covid19 or otherwise, it denies the truth and in a “feel better” phrase speaks of “renewing our faith communities.”

Honest talking is not in the blood of hyper-emotional and religiously correct. The other day, I was asked to ‘say’ sung Mass for streaming online. To this invitation I objected, stating that only when there is a community physically present in the Church, I would oblige to celebrate the Eucharist.  To my remarks that faith which is a free gift from God, and that it cannot be ‘transmitted’ but witnessed, some were surprised to such statement from a priest. For them my reply was certainly “inappropriate.” Many terms are designed to disguise the reality of religious, spiritual psychological and physical realities. When the hierarchy promotes such pseudo certainty out of sentimental win-win game, it is untruth. The uncritical acceptance of such shadowed expressions helps advance a radical post-truth living without conscience. Much of our contemporary verbal engineering to keep people from confirming that something is “wrong” disfigures the truth, and therefore, it reduces Catholic faith and morals to pious sentimentalities.

Without reference to the central fact of Christian faith – the Cross and Resurrection – it is easy to manipulate human emotions and accommodate vague ideas. An emotional “faith” expressed out of sentimental pietism, is contrary to God’s commands, and extremely dangerous. Sacrificial love on the Cross and the Christian joy of resurrection are two sides of the same coin. A balance of devotional and intellectual life by witnessing to the sacrificing and glorious features of faith in Jesus Christ is the middle path of life’s fulfilment.

It is harmful to play always win-win game, camouflaging reality under the garb of ‘goodness’ that does not hurt but compromise. Rigorist heresies and overly sentimental devotional practices to counter them have been dangerous in the past. Over emphasizing the Resurrection with the sentiments of love, joy and gratitude, detached from God’s law of truth, Christian life loses the sacrificial nature of the truth, and becomes emotionalism in faith practices. Driven by affections, love becomes emotional, not according to God’s will.  Such dysfunction affects one’s moral and religious growth. Parents shower affection while over protecting their children more than accepting them as God’s gifts. The result is an emotionally “spoiled child.” Over clericalism, too, can overprotect the faithful with sentimental affections manifested through virtual online prayers, novenas, streaming of mass and Eucharistic adoration, than considering them as created in God’s image and likeness,  and that it needs natural nurturing of the seeds of faith already freely sown by God. So instead of offering them spiritual tools for salvation, priests may become pious ‘saviours’ saving by pandering to the emotions of parishioners. Basically, these are the ‘needs’ of the clergy themselves and not necessarily that of the faithful, for their faith expressions are stronger and dynamic than the clergy think of. The same lawless sentimentality sets faith adrift san reason. Who needs critical thought and discernment in the midst of difficult situations, if we live seeking/giving consolations through sentimental pietism? Unbridled human emotion, without critical questioning, begins to drive the faithful away from the real world of God – the creation.

Superficial religiosity and godlessness are, to a great extent, played on sentimental pietism inclusive of many superstitious practices. God finds no pleasure in the blood-filled and burnt sacrifices. God does not need offerings, big churches and pilgrimages. God does not want that people trample and stifle upon God’s truth in the name of ritual worship, because festive assemblies are filled with filth. Human hands are full of blood! Therefore, God says, learn to do good, be just, redress the wrong and defend the poor (cf. Is 1:10-17). Jesus speaks straight, “whoever does not take up his cross and follow after me is not worthy of me” (Mt 10:38).

In the existing culture of relativism, the moral and universal law over creation is still in place which is for everyone, that is, abiding by the Truth. It means to be deeply united with God in spirit and truth in the midst of joys and sorrows. Without a firm grounding in the Cross (Kerygma), Resurrection (Mystagogy), Commandments, and the whole of creation with its traditions and cultures, people will abandon the Church. Detached from culture and reason, the sentimental faith-expressions becomes ill-educated, arrogant, and vicious.

A return to sanity begins with a balance between Cross and the Resurrection, between faith and reason. Jesus teaches us to love Him above our families, and that if we do not take up our crosses through discernment based on reason and intuition, and follow Him, we are not worthy to be His disciples. (cf. Mt. 10:37-42) Breaking away from sentimental inclination to religious practices and unholy attachments to sentimental pietism, even within families, is dangerous. This is the ‘cross-reality’ we all need to carry daily. Then comes the joyful fruit of sacrificial love, the Resurrection into a new life that comes with a personal closeness with Jesus who invites: “Come to me, all who labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me; for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls.” (Mt. 11:28-30). Similarly, He says regarding the Cross, “If you keep my commandments, you will abide in my love” and on Resurrection, “These things I have spoken to you, that my joy may be in you, and that your joy may be full.” (Jn. 15:10-11). The vicious and sentimental pietism must be overcome by an honest examination of conscience, measuring our lives against Good News and all the directives given in it, and taking responsibility for our actions. When we resolve to follow Jesus above everything, even at the price of losing friendship and ‘good name’, we will break the bonds of seductive sentimentality.[1]

           






[1] The term ‘Seductive Sentimentality’ and some of the ideas are from, Jerry J. Pokorsky, Breaking from Seductive Sentimentality, July 12, 2020, https://www.thecatholicthing.org/2020/07/12/breaking-from-seductive-sentimentality/, 14.7.2020





AN OPEN LETTER TO SMT. MAMATA BANERJEE The Chief Minister, cum the Health and Police Minister of W. Bengal

Smt. Mamata,   In an earlier open letter, I congratulated you for taking oath for the past consecutive terms as the Chief Minister of B...