From Traditionalistic to Progressive Catholicism
A Salesian Priest Psychologist, Peter Lourdes, while giving
a homily during the Eucharist celebration with the 4th Year students
of theology, on 24 October, 2009, at Morning Star college, Barrackpore, West
Bengal, said that he found himself lost being in the midst of a world of Bible,
Philosophy and Theology scholars. He felt himself as a fish out of water!
According to him, although there is a lot of Philosophy in the various schools
of Psychology, this subject itself (Psychology) is not considered Philosophy
but Science. Therefore, “the hot breeze blowing between Religion and Science”
often blows against Psychology and other human sciences.
The truth is, in today’s post-truth society, Religion and
Science will have to take each other seriously. We are constantly seeking the
truth. Ours is an ongoing search for the truth. Can the Catholic Church and Science recognize
each other? Or just travel on parallel lines? History proves that the Church,
for very long, ran on parallel lines with other Christian religions. Little by
little, with cautious moves, She then “crossed lines and began to take them
more seriously” says Peter Lourdes. If
this has happened gradually, a similar thing can happen with the Church and
Science as well.
We can make an attempt to find some answers to this
problem. In the course of history, what
has happened in the Church, is a
shifting of her centre of identity. That foundational shift, made possible for
the Church to cross the lines, and meet with other Religions and Sciences.
At one time the Church was convinced that the earth was the
centre of the universe, that the Sun revolved around it. The hierarchical
Church (still not yet ‘People of God’!), looked at the universe from that centre
of gravitation and felt a sense of security being at the centre of the world. Church
became the centre of self-reference. It is the place from which the Church referred
to herself and told others who they were and ‘what they should be’. Church felt
ambitiously ‘good’ (self-righteous) about herself within a limited space,
unable to see beyond her boundaries. Later, that very centre was shifted, and
the Church began to see the universe differently. She enlarged her vision and stretched
herself beyond the boundaries and came to recognize more of the universe. A
progressive move began to take place, and the process is still continuing, but
with much ‘murmurings’, and many obstacles created from within.
Each time the Church moved from her centre of
self-reference, Peter Lourdes holds, the boundaries were stretched. There was a
time when She was Church-centred (Ecclesio-
centric), and to a certain extent, still is. From such self-centred
identity, she continued feeling self-satisfied, and at home only with fellow Catholics,
leaving aside other Christians. They were left outside the boundary, with very
little recognition or communication. Salvation was considered to be the
‘in-thing’, only for those, within the Catholic fold. Such traditionalistic
mindset still continues within the Church.
Recently, Pope Francis has already taken some measures
against traditionalists (motu proprio Traditionis custodies) which goes
against his consistent emphasis on dialogue to attain unity. Certainly, suppression
cannot be the way. Traditionalists with particular liturgical tastes are also
those with corruption of various kinds; and dialogue becomes impossible. Only
way is to move ahead in the progressive path through reason (science) and
faith, at the same time keeping watch over
the more dangerous aspects of traditionalism. Many traditionalists
reject the Second Vatican Council, refusing to go with the present world
realities, and are historically connected to “racism, anti-Semitism,
homophobia, and the authoritarianism of today's Catholic integralists” (Gregory
Hillis, Unity without Reduction, https://international.la-croix.com/news/religion/unity-without-reduction/15626,
18.2.2022).
Church history showed some evidences that later She moved from
Ecclesio-centric to Christo-centric,
and so She began to recognize all those centred on Christ. Her boundaries were
stretched and other Christian religions (denominations) became part of her ‘neighbourhood’
through an ecumenical spirit. She was able to recognize and talk with all
believers in Christ as partners, if not equal. This resulted through the Second
Vatican Ecumenical Council.
However true this might be, there is a disjoint between the
dialectical focus of Francis’ thought and what is found in Traditionis
custodes. Certainly, the ecclesial unity cannot be imposed from above, yet
efforts must be made to move from polarity to communion despite tension –
towards harmonizing opposites. Progressive unity is possible with synthesis of
past and the future, than through reduction. Progressive unity becomes more
difficult without reducing conflict. Progressive unity is to be lived out in
creative tension.
Any non-dialogical approach can never achieve to build a
progressive Church. Neither can one force the traditionalists into conformity.
Incongruities can be noticed in Traditionis custodes that insists on
open dialogue. Traditionalists, lacking nuance, are fixed on their ideology,
and are disinterested in any dialogue and discernment for change. Additionally,
the ecclesial divisions are too often promoted by social media. We must acknowledge real differences existing
between these groups in the fields of theology, ecclesiology and morality,
though there are traditionalists who try to understand the progressives. Real
communion is realized in a dialogical form, in the patient development of
interconnections among all sections of society, irrespective of creed and
caste. As a Church we need to engage with them, than to demonize opponents.
Often enough the progressives refuse to acknowledge anything good in the other.
These differences are not new in the Church. In the course of the years after
the Second Vatican Council, the divisions between "conservatives" and
"progressives" are more noticed and re-enforced. Some conservatives
"go to any length in order to defend their own fanatical concept of the
Church" (Gregory Hillis, Unity without Reduction). Not only is
their understanding of tradition "static and inert"; it actually
celebrates some of the most questionable aspects of Church history:
"Inquisition, persecution, intolerance, Papal power, clerical influence,
alliance with worldly power, love of wealth and pomp, etc." They're
characterized by triumphalism and a belief that they are the Church. We
should be also beware of "extreme progressives." While progressives
speak of dialogue and openness, they are often “closed” to others. This is
"arrogant triumphalism" that ridicules and dismisses conservative
voices.
The Church under the
leadership of Pope Francis is now moving towards another centre of
self-reference, Theo-centric, through an inter-faith and ecumenical
efforts in the recent years. Through such progressive approach, the
Church is beginning to “recognize not only those seeking Christ, but also all
those seeking God.” Interfaith dialogues, prayer-meets, signing of documents
together with the Muslim leaders, etc. are signs of considering other religions
as equal partners. The whole human species and the whole of creation (Laudato
Si’) are considered as our neighbours. We all are on the path together with
our “up-and-down search for God.” This is not just overcoming boundaries. It is
a move to abolish the ‘lines of actual control’, notes Peter Lourdes. Once, Swami
Vivekananda, when as an Indian delegate at the World Parliament of Religions in
Chicago, addressed the assembly as “My
Brothers and Sisters”, the audience burst into loud and long (15 mins)
applause with a standing ovation. For him, the centre of identity was not his
nation, nor himself. His centre was God
and humanity, who are in search of a universal Supreme Being.
What is next then? Here is a broad generalizations on a
prospective progressive Church that calls for serious scientific studies. In the
coming Synod 2023 and later, the Church presumably may shift her centre of
self-reference to cosmotheandric, universe, God and human species – towards Universal Brotherhood (cf. Gaudium Spes, 38). The
human family strives together human progress, making the earth a home for true
brotherhood, through the transformative love (God is love) in justice
and peace. Consequently, as Peter
Lourdes further notes, She will recognize and dialogue, as an equal partner,
with the physical sciences (cosmos), the sacred sciences (theos),
philosophy and the human race (andric).
Following the ‘mea culpa’ over the Galileo
case, the Church will continue acknowledging her mistakes and her stubborn
stands, and build bridges of peace with the physical sciences. But still, She will
have to make peace with the human sciences (psychology included). In order to
achieve such target, She needs to move her centre towards the Cosmotheandric
reality. Then only, peace efforts and dialogues will be possible. Just as the cosmic ‘neighbourhood’ stretched over,
beyond the catholic boundaries including ecology and eco-theology; just as the
Church moved the centre from earth to sun, so will the People of God’s search
for the Truth (Reality) will further expand. Along with the continuous
evolution and expansion of the Universe, the Church will see diversity and
complexity in a progressive search for the immeasurable Truth, and be more
aware of a deep, underlying connection of the whole of creation, even what is
beyond the grasp of human intelligence. Then, as Peter Lourdes notes, the ‘God’
we have been seeking, worshipping and fighting over, will become “everybody’s
secret” (Upanishads), under the single universal brotherhood and sisterhood.
Here ‘God’ (Father/Mother) refers to one Jesus prayer to, affirms Peter Lourdes. Matthew Arnold (1822-88),
once re-defined Christian religion as “morality touched with emotion.” This may
be true, but we cannot allow this religion to be the ‘opium’ of the People of
God, to which to get drugged and addicted! In Indian philosophical and
theological understanding, God is one in union (Yog): of loftiness of God and
lowliness of wo/men. In this context, the Cosmic Christo-centric approach to
religion, will voice for communion, of one bringing the whole of creation back
together.
Everything from God is holy;
all that is created, is good. This material world is holy and it reminds of God
incarnating into the world, dwelling within the creation. God delights in and
sustains the cosmos. With such worldview, it is possible to make the leap from
materialism to communion with the creation, by shifting our centre of identity from
mere possessions to being part of the rest; that the creation is a mystery beyond
the material — a spiritual reality included— opening itself to the divine.
Therefore, we live in this world as brothers and sisters, with the sense of the
sacred union with the rest of creation.