Saturday, January 27, 2024

Living in a multi-religious India today

 Pranprathistha is done at the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya on January 22nd;  the BAPS Hindu Temple in Abu Dhabi  will be inaugurated on 14th February. Elections could be anticipated then, while the Lotus 2.0 project continues to poach MLAs and destabilize the elected non-BJP governments! The PM  with the “aura of raja and rishi” — avatar of Indian political, religious and economic development– is all set for electorate gain, and  for Hindu Rashtra (Ram Rajya). Ache din, assurance of job and  benefit for  those socio-economically poor, are all gone! Now it is all about realizing the Hindutva ideology of the RSS. With a majoritarian political pressure and campaign  on centralising Hinduism, there is hype to instigate the religious sentiments of people, which has terrible psychological impact.  It is an irony, that in a secular country, democracy is measured by a majoritarian religious faith and practice. A nation where Schedule Caste, Dalits and other lower-caste people who converted to Islam, Sikhism and Christianity to escape the Brahminical caste-based oppression, are now treated as outsiders. The persecution of minorities is on the rise, and the perpetrators of oppressive offences go scot-free. And all this is done with “a discreet variant on strident saffron, a spiritual hue glowing with political purpose.”  The intention is not to improve the citizens’ living conditions, but to control their minds and actions on the pretext of ‘Ram Rajya’ based on a pseudo-‘dharma’. Beyond all else, the Hindutva spirit is forcefully hovering  all around.

 In short, Hindu religion is amalgamated with Indian nationalism – a fascist Hindutva consciousness, with ‘improvised’ ethics and ethos. Contrary to Gandhi’s inclusive common mission, the seeds of discord and division have already been sown in the secular nation’s lives, changing the core of belief systems of Indian society and politics. India with its past democratic,  inclusive and pluralist credentials beyond  caste or creed appears to be fragile today. The polarising  political currents with Hindutva dominance, afflict the Indian Republic.  The minorities are in need of protection from the formidable socio-religious and political ferment, with “signs of the triumph” of a particular faith. Today,  a cultural consciousness is embedded with  explicit and particular religious sensibilities, ingrained in  inequality and injustices.

 

The ruling dispensation is making mockery of democracy, by making mythically based idol-worship a primary political issue. It is a forceful move to make India a Hindu nation, trying to revive the ‘Sanatan Dharma’s, “Hindu social ethics of intrinsic inequity of castes.”  As Vishal Mangalwadi, in his open letter to Modi, writes about him, promoting the worship of  “mythical gods” instead of praying to “the sovereign Creator, the shaper of India’s destiny (Bharat Bhagya Vidhata)”.[1]  The national motto, Satyameva Jayate (Truth Alone Triumphs) has been overturned with myths and lies.  According to Gandhiji only truth liberates, myths enslave.

 

The invisible God who is pure Spirit without shape or form, cannot be turned into an image. Man-made gods, says Mangalwadi, are false gods, out of human imagination. Instead, we are created to seek truth and wisdom to understand the divine in us. Human civilization is built on this search for the truth, seeking God’s kingdom here on earth, based on social, moral and ethical values. Religion helps in righteous living with justice and equality. The present dominant political culture, on the contrary,  twists and turns, to fabricate false gods by ‘abusing’ religion for electoral gain. Infected with corruption, the Indian leadership has lost credibility. Human dignity must be protected, for the divine in the human is sacred.

 

We the people of a multi-faith India, along with the civil society activists, thinkers, writers, journalists, artists and other like-minded people need to work together to stop the fascist forces from misrule through different means. Unconditionally, without any selfish motives, we need to oppose strongly and forcefully, such arbitrary governance, and work towards rebuilding the federal, democratic and secular Indian Republic that guarantees a free dignified life of the common people. These bodies need to take a positive direction to ensure the same, through inter-faith dialogues and socio-cultural programs.

 

Together we need to demand that all anti-people Policies, and Acts be scrapped, and replace  them with the “People First” Policy, that ensures a stable, dignified and peaceful life of all Indians living in harmony with each other. The government is to be set at the centre that takes stringent action to curb the forces that indulge in spreading communal hatred; caste discrimination; violence against minorities and women; oppression of the weaker sections; and against those who destroy the environment.

 



[1] Cf. A letter "Idolatry: Essence and Consequences" written to Mr. Arun Shourie in 1994 (30th Aug) was published in Vishal Mangalwadi, Missionary Conspiracy: Letters to a Postmodern Hindu, Nivedit Good Books Distributors 1998.

 

 

Thursday, January 25, 2024

UNITED INTEGRAL LIVING IN INDIA WITHIN RELIGIO-SPIRITUAL PLURALITY

 


India is a country of diverse religions, cultures, and traditions. It is also a country that has faced many challenges and conflicts due to its diversity. However, India has also shown remarkable resilience and creativity in finding ways to live in harmony and mutual respect among its different communities. One of the concepts that can help us understand this phenomenon is united integral living, which refers to a holistic and inclusive approach to life that transcends narrow identities and boundaries. Now, this same India, that is Bharat,– influenced by the majoritarian RSS-BJP politics that emboldens its Right-Wings affiliations to persecu­te and oppress the minorities– is living through a phenomenon of Hindutva nationalism, and in the words of Arundhuti Roy, the “collective, psychological capture” leading to the “centralization of Hinduism”. In this present situation, how can then India achieve a united integral living within its religious spiritual plurality? This article aims to explore this question by examining the concept of united integral living, the factors that promote or hinder it, and the possible ways to foster it in the Indian context.

Integral living is a holistic approach to life that encompasses physical, mental, emotional, social, and spiritual dimensions. It is based on the recognition that all aspects of life are interconnected and interdependent, and that one's well-being depends on the well-being of others and the environment. Living in unity within Indian religio-spiritual plurality means that people of different faiths and backgrounds can coexist peacefully and cooperatively, while also respecting and celebrating their differences. It also means that people can integrate their spiritual values and practices into their daily lives, without compromising their integrity or authenticity. A united integral living in India is not a utopian ideal, but a realistic and achievable goal that has been demonstrated by many examples throughout history and in the present. It also implies a respect for diversity and a willingness to learn from different perspectives and traditions.

Here are some of the factors that contribute to united living within religio-spiritual plurality:

One of the factors that can promote united integral living in India is the common heritage of spirituality that underlies all religions. The ancient and rich philosophical traditions of India, such as Vedanta, Yoga, Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism, and others, that offer various paths and perspectives to attain the ultimate reality, which is often seen as one and the same by different names. India has been a cradle of such various spiritual traditions living in harmony, including  Islam, Christianity, and others. These traditions share some core values and principles, such as compassion, non-violence, service, harmony, and transcendence. They also offer different paths and practices to realize one's true nature and connect with the divine. By acknowledging and appreciating this common spiritual heritage, Indians can foster a sense of unity in diversity and a mutual respect for each other's beliefs and practices.

Another factor that can promote unity in religio-spiritual and cultural diversity in India is the culture of dialogue and pluralism that has been nurtured by its history and constitution. India has been a land of dialogue and exchange among different civilizations, cultures, and religions for centuries. The syncretic and pluralistic nature of Indian culture, which has absorbed and assimilated influences from various regions, civilizations, and eras, resulting in a mosaic of diverse expressions and manifestations of art, literature, music, architecture, cuisine, and more. The constitutional and legal framework of India, adopted a secular and democratic constitution that guarantees freedom of religion and expression, as well as equal rights, opportunities  and protection for all citizens regardless of their faith or background. By engaging in dialogue and pluralism, Indians of the Democratic Secular Socialist Federal Republic can enhance their understanding and appreciation of each other's views and values, as well as their common interests and challenges. They can also resolve their differences peacefully and constructively, without resorting to violence or extremism. The social and civic movements and initiatives that promote interfaith dialogue, harmony, and cooperation among different communities, such as the Sarva Dharma Samabhava (equal respect for all religions), the Interfaith Harmony Foundation of India, the United Religions Initiative, and others.

The personal and collective examples of leaders and role models who have embodied and advocated for unity in diversity, such as Mahatma Gandhi, Rabindranath Tagore, Swami Vivekananda, Mother Teresa, Abdul Kalam, Dalai Lama, and many more.

However, there are also some factors that can hinder harmonious living in Indian religious plurality. One of them is the rise of communalism and fundamentalism that threatens the secular fabric of the nation. Communalism is the tendency to emphasize one's religious identity over one's national identity, and to view other religions as enemies or rivals. Fundamentalism is the tendency to adhere to a rigid and literal interpretation of one's religion, and to reject any form of diversity or dialogue. Both communalism and fundamentalism can lead to intolerance, hatred, violence, and discrimination against those who belong to different religions or sects.

Another factor that can hinder unity is the lack of education and awareness about the richness and diversity of India's religious spiritual plurality. Many Indians are ignorant or misinformed about the beliefs and practices of other religions or sects. They may also have stereotypes or prejudices about them based on media portrayals or political agendas. This can result in mistrust, fear, or hostility towards those who are different from oneself. It can also prevent one from learning from or collaborating with them for the common good.

Therefore, it is imperative to foster an united integral living in India within its religious spiritual plurality by addressing these factors. Some of the possible ways to do so are:

- Promoting interfaith dialogue and cooperation among different religious communities and organizations. This can help to build bridges of understanding, respect, and friendship among them. It can also help to identify and address the common issues and concerns that affect them all.

- Educating the youth about the diversity and richness of India's religious spiritual plurality. This can help to instil a sense of curiosity, appreciation, and openness towards other religions or sects. It can also help to dispel myths, misconceptions, or biases about them.

- Encouraging personal exploration and experimentation with different spiritual paths and practices. This can help to develop one's own spirituality and find what works best for oneself. It can also help to expand one's horizons and perspectives by experiencing different ways of relating to oneself, others, and the divine.

- Integrating spirituality into everyday life and social action. This can help to cultivate a holistic lifestyle that balances one's physical, mental, emotional, social, and spiritual needs. It can also help to express one's spirituality through service, compassion, justice, peace, and ecology.

 By implementing these measures, India can achieve integral living in unity within its religio-spiritual plurality. This can enhance its social cohesion, cultural diversity, national integration, global citizenship, and human development. Living in harmony in India is not only a possibility but a necessity for the survival and flourishing of humanity in the 21st century. It is a way of life that can foster peace, harmony, happiness, and well-being for all. It is a vision that can inspire us to transcend our differences and discover our common humanity. It is a challenge that can motivate us to grow and evolve as individuals and as a society.

 

Sunday, January 21, 2024

Love Your Neighbour: A Christian Unity Octave Ecumenical Reflection

 


The theme ‘You shall love the Lord your God… and your neighbour as yourself’ (Lk 10:27) of the Christian Unity Octave (2024), initiated by the Catholic and Protestant Churches, the World Council of Churches and other ecumenical bodies, and collaborated generously in drafting the prayers and reflections, reflects on the familiar story of the Good Samaritan, and all are encouraged to ‘Go and do likewise’. The ecumenical bodies of Churches through this moment, try to collaborate in making unity happen. The Gospel theme connects between love of God and love of neighbour beyond boundaries – in giving of self in service of the other. Jesus, throughout his ministry had only one Mission: to gather the ‘scattered tribes’— the rich and  the poor, the sinners and the saints,  the outcasts and the marginalized in charity, mercy, justice, and unity. All are welcome  to establish the unity of all God’s people, created in His image of loving the mankind. This presents, the coming together of heaven and earth — the coming of the Kingdom of God of unity, justice and peace; the coming together of divinity and humanity in Jesus, the Unifier and the Unified— yet distinct, in the plural-Trinity. Yet, how many divisions we find among the followers of Christ! Christian Unity Octave, is aimed at promoting unity, not just within the Churches, but among all peoples. This event, was influenced by French Catholic priest and theologian Paul Couturier (1881-1953), and based on Jesus’ prayer to God die Father: "That they may he one!" (John 17:21). Jesus asked for this not only for his followers, but for all humanity.

 What must we do to achieve such unity? This crucial question we all need to answer, if we are to find meaning of our life on earth and for eternity. Every person wants a life of fullness ( Jn 10:10), for “The glory of God is a human being fully alive” (St. Ireneus). The existential realities of life, with divisions and disunity, often distance us from the quest for the One God.

Our inner quest for unity brings us closer to God and to each other, by strengthening the Christian unity, through collaboration with Christians of all Churches. This can be a difficult task. It requires solid commitment to dialogue and discernment, ever open to the Spirit for the sake of serving God, and God alone, fulfilling Christ’s prayer– that all be one.  Jesus showed equal love to all, including the enemies. Being on the path of Christian unity, through loving one’s neighbour means not being selective, but being attentive to their needs, despite of diverse traditions.

Loving one’s neighbour “as yourself” presumes self-acceptance just as we are, and self-respect, acceptance of one’s own Church or community, with all its assets and failures. It is of natural instinct to love someone of the kin, of own faith, those sharing the social status, outlook and values. We prefer people and places of familiarity. Yet, the obligation is to love all, regardless of caste, colour, culture and creed. To be a ‘neighbour’ within a reality of distrust and uncertainly, is to open our hearts with love towards all,  especially those who are in need.

 Christians of diverse denominations need to go beyond convention, overcome “ecclesial and culturally conditioned short-sightedness” and see how the life and witness of other Christian faith-fellows reveal God’s love to others. It is only through widening our vision that we will be drawn to others in union with Christ. The story of the Good Samaritan teaches us that we learn more from those who are different from us, than those who think alike. Every situation serves as an opportunity to help the needy ‘other’. How do we, then, respond to our ‘neighbours’, within the Christian fold? How do we heal Christ’s ‘broken’ and ‘crumbling’ Church, manifested in superiority, insecurity, distrust and division?  Do the diverse prayerful and sacramental rituals of reconciliation, healing and blessings, build up the Church or do they persist in divisions that distance us further from God,  and wound the Body of Christ (Church). A Christian union that builds up the broken Church,  also enhances a national unity in diversity.

 The crave for social unity through solidarity requires  the recognition of others as brothers and sisters. However, when faced with insecurity, suspicion and distrust of our neighbours, hospitality and ecumenical dialogue become the starting steps towards unity, in contexts of religious and cultural pluralism. Christians, therefore, are challenged to find Christ within their Christian communities, by loving one another. Moving  beyond the confessional traditions overcoming hostility and hate, and by practicing ecumenical hospitality, we become ‘neighbour’ to each other –‘the one who shows mercy.’

 Neighbours are discovered in the most unexpected people and in unexpected situations. For example,  in today’s society that is so much polarized  by politics which set majoritarian religion against the minorities and by inter-communal conflict, Christians are challenged to cross the walls of separation and build unity. Following the Lord’s command –“Go and do likewise”, we are called to act mercifully, and genuinely love our neighbours – to be “other Christs.” We accept, recognize and respect, and not reject those who are different. We bring down the peace of God on all people of goodwill.  Christ calls all of us to enter in close relationships with members of other church traditions, and bear witness together to God’s love. We are called to be ambassadors for Christ (2 Cor 5:20), being reconciled to God and to one another. Working together for Christian unity through mutual trust, by  opening up ecclesial wounds, will only help rebuild the single Body of Christ.

 To some conservative factions of the various Church denominations, who consider the Catholic Pope Francis to be  a dangerously progressive, in his epiphany homily this year on the issue of  ideological splits in Church, asked the faithful to abandon “ecclesiastical ideologies”, and focus on poor, not 'theory'. He warned against “basking in some elegant religious theory” instead of finding “God who comes down to visit us”, especially in the poor. The Church needs to ensure that "our faith will not be reduced to an assemblage of religious devotions or mere outward appearance.” Instead, we open up more to each other, resolve conflict, and strengthens our bonds of unity. In fact, the same Francis and the Archbishop of Canterbury jointly have commissioned bishops for a unified mission. A special summit, took place during the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity, that brought together over 50 Anglican and Catholic bishops representing 27 countries. Additionally, some recent publications related to ecumenical movements, evoke the spirit of Pope Francis in charting a new course, exploring the “desire for Christian unity” with a global reach.[1]

 In the midst of many existing divisions among the followers of Christ, the effort towards Christian unity promotes ecumenical unity, as well as unity among all peoples, who seem to be in distress and pain. The prevalent practice is to claim an individual’s, group’s, or nation's distinct identity as different from others, by creating distance. It’s all about being oneself. Within this global ‘egotistic’ disorder and false nationalism with diverse identity-based communities, further fragmented by Hindutva political propositions,  the Christians face the challenge of identifying themselves as a single body of Christ, as mistrust is on the rise. It proves difficult to break the barrier of denominational identity in order to be recognised as 'Christians', building up a visible unity in Christ. Acknowledging each Church’s vulnerabilities, the varied voices and the prevailing cacophony, and by speaking with one voice under a common formula, the principle of unity is to be sought after, so that there be only one flock and one Shepherd – the Christ. Christian unity cannot be achieved through mere theoretical discussions. We need to seek new practical ways: to encounter one another, challenge each other, harmonize diversities, overcome conflicts and reconcile differences.

 In this context, the prayer moments during the Christian Unity Octave seeks the spiritual support of the ecumenical movement. A complete and universal Church unity is not just a goal, but a prophetic path for all Christian communities lead towards the common good of all, realized through a shared mission and witness. Through such ecumenical observances, prayer moments, dialogue and discussions, we can find concrete and creative paths to grow together in joint witness and mission. Jointly, as apostles of Christ, ecumenically we need to be ‘sent’ in reciprocal pairs, or through ecumenical groups, to be witnesses to Christian unity.

 It’s time for all the Churches and denominations jointly to move closer – a hard task though. All it needs is the will act now,  if we want to overcome the disunity in the Body of Christ. Through dialogue, personal friendships, learning from each other,  listening to the Gen-X youth, tapping their energy and enthusiasm, we can stir up the ‘ecumenical mantra’ against institutional inertia that is existing today. Let all denominations together make statements about political and social matters by resourcing all investigations and commissions through joint initiatives. And mostly, let the ecclesial authorities act in the light of the Gospel, through shared responsibility. Unity cannot be achieved through the personal authority of the supreme heads of the Churches alone. There is the need to explore ‘synodality’, within the ecumenical process, keeping guard against autocracy while being open to dissent, and to  exercise the freedom to be different. The need for pastoral care of the wounded and excluded through social charity  and through a leadership from below, would act as a catalyst to connect and build up that Christian unity – a hope for the future.

Finally, only an ecumenical opening to God’s love and love of neighbour, – the primary principle of pursuing peace and reconciliation – will help discover our shared identity. Such quest may be hindered by the eroded moral values and a commercialized spirituality, a lack of humaneness and of concern for the common good, probity and integrity. Therefore, faced with these realities, it is all the more imperative for all the Christian Churches to witness to God’s love as a single member of the Body of Christ. 

 Lord Jesus Christ, as we walk with You towards unity, let us not avert our gaze from the world, but keep it vigilant. Grant that, as we travel the paths of our life, we are able to stop and hold out our hand, to bind up the wounded and thus feel that You are present in them, You who live and reign forever and ever. Amen.



[1] The ecumenical movement is understood as a twentieth-century movement of European origin with a global reach. The book, (L’unità dei cristiani. Storia di un desiderio. XIX-XXI secolo. I. Aurora ecumenicae), A History of the Desire for Christian Unity. Ecumenism in the Churches (19th–21st Century) is a multi-volume reference work on the history of ecumenism, "a reference work, a reconstruction of the arc of time in which the Christian churches transitioned from a position of hostility to one of dialogue, and from separation to forms of communion. Scholars across the continents and disciplines explore a history of individuals and groups, generations and assemblies, documents and programs, theologies and practices, all firmly placed within the framework of a desire for unity." An international research project its text brings together contributions from scholars of various disciplines and different Churches. It shows how Christians, during the 19th  and 20th centuries, participated in a process unprecedented in the history of the Church, towards the need for the unity not only of Christians, but of all people. This is the first of three-volume work project.  Cf. Alberto Melloni (Author), Luca Ferracci (ed), A History of the Desire for Christian Unity - Ecumenism in the Churches, 19th-21st Century, Dawn of ecumenism, Foundation for Religious Sciences,  Brill, Leiden, 2021.

 

 

Thursday, January 18, 2024

To Think with the Church

 I have spent the last thirty-three years of my priesthood and forty-two years of my consecrated religious life, mostly as a priest, educator in faith and life, writer, and pastoring youth. To be with the Church, according to me is, that to think with the Church one requires that one thinks. Only through thinking that the Church doctrines, dogmas and directives appeal to the will and to reason.  We believe understanding, and understand believing.  Above all, loving  we obey, and we are enlightened. We then open to the light.  We hear and heed to the heart, and not just “hearing about,” being apprised of.  The faith matter is not mere “theological data”. Instead of turning away from facts, it is meant to dive deeply into “thinking about reality”.[1]  We often run the risk of substituting reality with subjective imagination and faith-expressions,  instead of treading truth with passion and reason.  Going behind the non-essentials, leads often to confusion, corruption, and contempt.

 The Church has no power to declare the bad to be good. God is Absolute Good. We need to be realistically grounded and not be on “high spiritual romance”.  Things can always be otherwise.  If so, Church-sin can do “immense social harm” if we think with Church’s thinking, and not think.

 To some conservative factions of the Catholic Church who consider him to be  a dangerously progressive, the present Pope Francis in his epiphany homily this year on the issue of  ideological splits in Church, asked the faithful to abandon “ecclesiastical ideologies”, and focus on poor, not 'theory'. He warned against “basking in some elegant religious theory” instead of finding “God who comes down to visit us”, especially in the poor. The Church needs to ensure that "our faith will not be reduced to an assemblage of religious devotions or mere outward appearance.” Pope Francis allows “the possibility of blessing couples in irregular situations and same-sex couples without officially validating their status or changing in any way the Church’s perennial teaching on marriage”. On this controversial blessing of the same-sex couples, while making efforts to make LGBTQ Catholics feel welcome, he stresses that the ordinary pastoral blessing is not heretical and that it has no doctrinal grounds to reject.

A lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, and queer (LGBTIQ) Christian tries to follow a man-Jesus who, without any formal scientific theological qualification, confronted difficult questions of life and society, with responses arising out of common sense, for the common good. His responses based themselves on understanding of his Father’s will and the real situation of the person in time and place, and the rest did not matter for him. He did not  act according to set precedence, norms, rules, rituals, canons, or magisterium. Jesus mostly took a different path naturally programmed by God his Father, to outgrow his ministry. He often engaged in “disruptive behaviour” in all that he said, did or failed to do. He, the ‘untrained’ one,  trained himself the Father’s way, who is ever understanding, gentle, kind yet firm.

For the religious leaders, Jesus seemed to be “intrinsically disordered”, one who  was disrespectful to the prevalent religious laws and directives. Jesus had a “theological discourse”, while exposing the Samaritan woman’s multiple marriages and her cohabiting nature — irregular sexual relationship. Unlike other ‘religious experts’ (Pharisees, Scribes), Jesus  the teacher committed himself to educating with the heart, with ‘loving kindness’, and dialogued with sinners with respect and dignity,  calling them to repentance. He did not condone sins, neither condemn them.

 God through the Church calls all to conversion and commission all to be his messengers of love — the good news. Jesus the Messiah, the Saviour of the world, likewise want the Church, his Body, to act in ways that fittingly qualifies its members, in Jesus’ mode of ministry. Breaking the religious rules (man-made), can hasten the ‘salvation of the world’. This is the vision of Christ, — the coming of the Kingdom of God. This is the thinking of the Church — a new way of ordering things, with love and non-violence. Like Jesus, the Church too has to face the resistance of “the world,” cruelty, corruption, betrayal, denial, lies,  hatred and violence. God, the Absolute, who is all love, is above all religions or societal norms. Our pettiness and stupidity, our human justification cannot mow down His love. God meets us as we ARE, because God IS — Absolute Being without any form. Human encounter with God is devoid of judgments that are subject to the religious and societal norms. This is the new thinking of the Church, inaugurating the new creation and  bringing humanity into communion with God.

 Therefore, the traditionalists are rightly to be disturbed, just as those religious leaders two thousand years ago. They  engineered the 'blasphemer-Jesus’ execution because he posed a threat to the status quo, to their control over the religiosity of the common people. The hardness of human heart rejects God’s merciful love, and tries to “usurp the place of God”. 

 The secular cultural world, with regard to the Church, considers that something in her that is indissolubly linked to the human heart. Whereas, for Christians, the Church acts as the conscience of people, to act for the common good and coexist peacefully. It is a ‘religion of  freedom’, enlightened by the high reason of Christian faith in Jesus. She constructs common goals and tries to solve concrete problems of the society.  The Church combines the secular and the religious dimensions, converging on a common  and mutual enrichment. Facing a crisis of values and the loss of the religious living, the Church validly still continues to build up the kingdom of God — the Absolute, within a secularized world.

 

AN OPEN LETTER TO SMT. MAMATA BANERJEE The Chief Minister, cum the Health and Police Minister of W. Bengal

Smt. Mamata,   In an earlier open letter, I congratulated you for taking oath for the past consecutive terms as the Chief Minister of B...