WHEN SCIENCE MEETS SPIRIT: INDIA TO TAKE ITS WISDOM SERIOUSLY

 Abstract:

This article explores the emerging convergence between science and spirituality, two realms long perceived as opposites. Using the experience of Federico Faggin—the microchip pioneer who later championed consciousness as the basis of reality—it highlights how modern scientific inquiry is beginning to engage with ancient spiritual insights, particularly those rooted in Indian traditions like the Upanishads. As rigid scientific materialism faces growing scrutiny, and faith-based claims are held to higher standards of evidence, this shift invites both disciplines to rethink their core assumptions. Drawing inspiration from early 20th-century dialogues between Indian sages and pioneering scientists, the piece calls for India to rekindle its legacy of thoughtful inquiry. It advocates for renewed investment in philosophical and interdisciplinary research, urging a balanced dialogue that transcends cultural pride and fosters a shared quest to understand consciousness, reality, and the human experience.

Introduction:  "Science and Spirit combined: to Rediscover India’s Forgotten Dialogue."

True, science opposed spirituality for too long, differentiating between facts and faith. But now, things are changing. There is now an interest for the scientists to find a link between spiritual traditions and observed and tried physical and factual findings. Raag Yadava, in his column in The Telegraph, (Kolkata 21.06.25) titled “Complementary union” says that as the cutting edge of science in Western academic institutions is now beginning to take spiritual ideals embodied in Indian traditions seriously, it is time that we Indians take our own ideas seriously. He writes explaining that in an age where science and spirituality often seem at odds, modern scientists and seekers of deeper truths—remind us that the boundaries between the material and the mystical are not as fixed as we once believed. The transformative experience and spiritual reflections on material sciences echo ancient Indian philosophies, reviving timeless insights like Aham Brahmasmi within a modern scientific framework. This emerging convergence of consciousness studies, quantum theory, and spiritual wisdom signals a broader paradigm shift, one India has historically pioneered through figures like Swami Vivekananda, Sri Aurobindo and many others. Yet, according to the author, in our present rush to reclaim past glories, we risk diluting this rich intellectual legacy with superficial claims. What we need now is not nostalgia, but a renewed spirit of inquiry—one that values both skepticism and wonder in the quest for truth.

1. Science and Spirituality: From Opposition to Dialogue

For centuries, science and spirituality have been seen as opposites—science relying on evidence and reason, spirituality on faith and inner experience. But this rigid divide is slowly dissolving. A growing number of leading scientists are now exploring ideas long held in spiritual traditions, especially those from India. This signals an important cultural and intellectual turning point: a serious engagement between two worldviews that once seemed irreconcilable.

There is a shift in thinking. The old scientific view—that all our thoughts and feelings come only from the brain’s chemistry—is now being questioned. At the same time, some religious claims are also being challenged for lacking evidence, and often superstitious. There is a move – both in science and religion– towards rethinking of their assumptions.

2. A Modern Mystical Experience: Federico Faggin’s Story

One striking example, according to Raag Yadava, is Federico Faggin, the inventor of the microchip. Despite achieving immense professional success, Faggin once felt spiritually empty. During a family vacation in the 1990s, he had a profound mystical experience—a sudden and overwhelming sense of joy, love, and unity with everything around him. This event changed the course of his thinking. Years later, in his 2024 book Irreducible: Consciousness, Life, Computers, and Human Nature, Faggin challenged the dominant scientific view that consciousness is just a by-product of brain activity. Instead, he argued that consciousness is the very foundation of reality—not matter. His conclusions echo the ancient Indian insights of the Upanishads, where statements like “Aham Brahmasmi” ("I am that") point to a deeper, unified spiritual reality behind all appearances.

3. Toward a Paradigm Shift

This growing interest in consciousness is part of a broader intellectual shift. The old assumption in science—that everything can be explained through physical and chemical processes—is being questioned. At the same time, religion is also under pressure to offer logical, evidence-based explanations rather than depend on dogma. Yadava writes that the Philosopher Thomas Kuhn described such transitions as paradigm shifts—periods when established systems of thought undergo radical rethinking. We seem to be living through such a time, where scientists, philosophers, and spiritual seekers alike are looking for deeper, unified answers that neither side can offer alone to the fundamental questions on life.

4. India’s Forgotten Legacy of Integration

Interestingly, India once played a central role in this very conversation. India has a rich history of engaging in these questions seriously. In the early 20th century, spiritual leaders like Swami Vivekananda and Sri Aurobindo engaged deeply with scientific thinkers like Nikola Tesla, Lord Kelvin, and J.C. Bose. These figures rejected both religious superstition and scientific arrogance, and instead sought a more balanced, thoughtful inquiry into the nature of reality. They criticized both blind faith and overconfident science, instead seeking a deeper understanding of reality that united both— a unified understanding of reality that embraced both reason and faith.

Their dialogue wasn’t about proving who was right—it was about learning from one another, and bringing the rigor of science and the depth of spirituality into a single framework. Sadly, this legacy of exploration has weakened in recent decades.

5. The Crisis of Shallow Debates

Today, much of the public debate around India’s spiritual traditions has been reduced to culture wars and sensational claims with a Hindutva nationalist’s mindset. Discussions about whether Ganesha had plastic surgery or Karna was a product of genetic engineering trivialize the profound insights of Indian philosophy. These kinds of arguments harm genuine scholarship and turn ancient wisdom into easy tools for pride or political agendas.

As a result, in the higher educational settings, real research into India’s spiritual and philosophical heritage often gets sidelined or politicized —focused more on proving ancient myths than on doing real research. The public debates are often reduced to cultural pride or pseudo-scientific claims —like arguing that ancient Indian epics prove the existence of plastic surgery or genetic engineering. These arguments do more harm than good. They distract from serious, thoughtful research and turn our rich traditions into easy soundbites. The deeper question—how science and spirituality can meaningfully support each other—is being forgotten.

6. A Call to Take Our Own Heritage Seriously

Ironically, writes Yadava, while Western academia is now showing serious interest in Indian spiritual ideas—like yoga, consciousness studies, Ayurveda, and Vedantic philosophy—India itself seems hesitant to invest in its own traditions with intellectual seriousness. It’s time for us to change that. It’s time India takes its own heritage seriously too. We need to value our own intellectual and spiritual heritage. India has immense potential to lead the global conversation on the mind, consciousness, healing, and human purpose—but it needs consistent investment in education, research, and academic freedom. Universities must invest in philosophy of faith (Religion, Spirituality) and fundamental science. Research into consciousness, brain-mind interactions, quantum physics, and traditional healing systems like yoga and Ayurveda needs funding, freedom, and encouragement. We need stronger philosophy departments, better funding for fundamental science, and open, critical dialogue between disciplines.

In short, we need to move beyond culture wars and ego battles, and instead, create a shared space where both spiritual insight and scientific method can help us better understand what it means to be human.

7. Small Steps, Bigger Vision

Encouragingly, steps are being taken. Government initiatives like the Indian Knowledge Systems Division and the National Education Policy (NEP) hint at a renewed interest. There are promising signs. But, both call for a revival of India’s ancient knowledge traditions. These are just the beginning. What’s needed, says Raag Yadava, is a collaborative effort—among government, academia, and private donors—to nurture a culture where science and spirit can grow together, not in competition, but in complementary union. This would not only honour India’s past but shape a more integrated and humane future.

 But much more needs to be done to nurture an atmosphere where science and spirit can grow together—not as enemies, but as partners in understanding what it means to be human.

Conclusion: The Opportunity Before Us

We stand at a rare and powerful moment. Now, as Western academia starts to explore Indian spiritual ideas seriously, we must ask ourselves—are we doing the same? Are we valuing our own intellectual and spiritual heritage enough? If not, it’s time to change that. As the world grows more open to insights from Indian traditions, India itself must rise to the occasion—not with pride or nostalgia, but with seriousness, curiosity, and vision.

India has the potential to be a leader in this space—but it needs support. Our universities must invest in philosophy and fundamental science. Research into consciousness, brain-mind interactions, quantum physics, and traditional healing systems like yoga and Ayurveda needs funding, freedom, and encouragement.

Let’s not miss this opportunity. The world is ready to listen. It’s time we took our own ideas seriously too. It’s time to reclaim the best of our past and boldly carry it into the future. The world is ready to listen. The real question is: are we ready to speak with wisdom, depth, and integrity?

From Division to Discipleship: The Spirit’s Call in a Troubled World

The World We See and the Hope We Hold

The glorious nearly 100 days of Easter season is over—a sacred time that reminds us of the most transformative truth in human history: Christ has conquered sin and death. Yet, in the present ordinary time, when we look at the world around us, we are struck not by triumph but by turmoil. News headlines speak of division, hatred, and conflict. We see it globally and nationally, but also in our own communities, in our families, and, heartbreakingly, even within the Church.

But there is hope.

This recent Pentecost feast, proclaims a world made new through the Spiritus Sanctus—the holy breath of love between the Father and the Son– the love that exists between the two. This Spirit doesn’t just inspire; it sanctifies, unifies, and sends us out. It is the same Spirit that empowered the apostles in the Upper Room and sent them into the world to proclaim the Good News.

The same Spirit that Sends Us Forth

The Church was never meant to remain cloistered. From the very beginning, it has been propelled outward with a divine urgency. The Holy Spirit is not passive; it moves with “centrifugal energy,” drawing us out of comfort and into mission.

Jesus’ ministry was the meeting of heaven and earth. His life and Resurrection shattered the illusion that darkness has the final word. His wounds remind us of our sin; his peace assures us of our salvation. And through Pentecost, we are filled with the very Spirit that raised him from the dead.

As disciples, we are summoned—not by our own plans but by God’s. True evangelization doesn’t stem from strategy, but from surrender; from Spirit-led inspiration and not from motivated human suggestion. The question is no longer “Will I go?” but rather, “Where is the Spirit sending me?” What does the Spirit prompt me to do next?

Evangelizing a Wounded Culture

We believe that to evangelize a culture, you must first love it. Cardinal George wisely noted, “You can’t evangelize a culture you don’t love.” This mission—to propose the true, the good, and the beautiful in a spirit of unity—is what drives the present-day media outreach, both old and new.

In a world deeply fractured, this love, born of the Spirit, is the only force strong enough to reconcile. And reconciliation, as the Latin root reminds us, is about intimacy—being brought “face to face” with the other. That is the power of Christ: to restore, to heal, and to reconcile humanity with God and one another.

Your Role in the Mission

As we have reflected on the Solemnity of Pentecost and today the Memorial of Mary, Mother of the Church, we are reminded that the Spirit and the Blessed Mother are not relics of history—they are agents of the present. Just as they once brought Christ into the world, they now seek to bring Christ to birth in our hearts, our homes, and our culture.

All are invited to this Spirit-led mission. Our reciprocal support helps the Church (People of God) continue proclaiming Christ across platforms and continents, reaching those who might never step inside a church. We have received the Holy Spirit. We are encouraged to share the ‘Spirit force’ generously so that more hearts may be kindled with the fire of divine love.

Go Forth, United in the Spirit

Jesus offers us both a reminder and a mission: “Peace be with you.” This is not a peace the world can manufacture. It is a divine peace—Shalom—that flows from the heart of God. The world may be broken, but the Church is alive. And the Spirit is still moving.

Let us go forth, not with fear but with fire. Let us follow Christ, deny ourselves, take up our crosses, and bring God’s peace to every corner of the earth.

Together, let’s “make disciples of all nations” (Matt. 28:19) and “renew the face of the earth”– our common home.

Critique: "Transformative Formation" - Towards an Incarnational and Holistic Growth

 

     

Introduction  

The module "Transformative Formation" presents a valuable focus on change and renewal at a personal level within human-Christian life. However, a critique from philosophical and theological perspectives reveals a potential pitfall in its conceptual framing, particularly concerning the prefixes "trans-" or "meta-". This critique argues for a paradigm shift: Christian formation is fundamentally incarnational and immanent, occurring from within the world, not as a trans-forming beyond it. True transformation is about becoming fully, authentically human within God's creation, acting as its renewing agents, not aspiring to egoistically escape it.

This critique on the Module on personal growth titled: Transformative Formation, argues that Christian formation is from within the world and not something 'trans' or 'meta'. Besides, the term transformation connotes a contra-change, as if, forming into another type of being. God's creative living and non-living things are much part of the world. If we are to trans-form (beyond the natural ‘form’) from the world, the 'light' needed for the world would be missing. God never wants us to be ‘transformed’ into extra-ordinary (extra-terrestrial) being, instead to be a better human being here on earth, in order to better the world and all that is within. Our better living is meant to transform the world culture from within. From an Indian perspective the formation of the person - physical, mental, emotional, psychological and spiritual- is a holistic growth towards a fuller being, man and woman.

 

1. Rejecting the "Trans-/Meta-" Implication

 

• Philosophical Critique (Immanence vs. Transcendence): The terms "transformative" and certainly "trans-" or "meta-" formation can subtly imply a movement away from or above the material, historical, and social reality of the world. This risks reintroducing a neo-Platonic or Gnostic dualism that Christianity, rooted in the doctrine of the Incarnation ("The Word became flesh" - John 1:14), fundamentally rejects. Creation, declared "good" by God (Gen 1), is not a prison to escape but the very arena of God's redemptive action. The word "formation" comes from Latin (formātiō) and ultimately Greek, tracing back to the verb "to form" and the noun "form". The word "formation" was borrowed into English from Old French "formacion". In essence, the word's etymology reveals its core meaning of shaping, creating, or giving form to something already existing. The core concept, therefore, is the act of giving form, to something either literally or metaphorically. The repeated version of the same root-verb – “to form” (noun: form) – is quite a tautology. Formation isn't about becoming otherworldly (transformative) but becoming more truly worldly (formative) in the sense of inhabiting creation as God intended.

 

• Theological Critique (Incarnation & Kingdom): God's decisive act was entering the world in Jesus Christ, not removing believers from it. Jesus prayed not that his followers "be taken out of the world," but that they be protected within it (John 17:15). The Kingdom of God is proclaimed as breaking into this world, renewing it from within (Matt 6:10). Formation, therefore, is about embodying the values and life of this Kingdom here and now, participating in God's ongoing work within creation. To seek a "trans-" formation is to misunderstand the mission – we are the "yeast" (Matt 13:33), essential within the dough of the world to bring about its leavening. Removing the yeast renders it ineffective.

 2. Transformation as Renewed Humanity within Creation

 

• The Goal: Normal and better Human Beings, Not Extra-ordinary: The critique rightly emphasizes that God's desire is not to transform us into alien beings disconnected from earthly reality, but into the fullness of humanity exemplified by Christ – the "New Adam" (1 Cor 15:45-49). This "better human being" is characterized by love, human Rights, justice, compassion, wisdom, unity, peace and holiness, lived out concretely within relationships, society, and the natural world. Formation is the process of shedding the distortions of sin (de-formation) to recover and flourish in our true, God-imaged humanity.

• Transforming Culture from Within: Authentic Christian formation equips individuals and communities to engage critically and constructively with the surrounding socio-cultural realities. It fosters discernment to reject what is dehumanizing while embracing and elevating what is good, true, and beautiful. This engagement is not from a position of detached superiority ("meta-"), but from deep immersion and participation ("from within"). The transformed believer acts as a catalyst for cultural renewal precisely because they remain fully part of the cultural matrix, embodying an alternative way of being human within it.

 

3. The Imperative for Holistic Formation

Integrating the Indian Perspective: The critique's call for a "holistic formation towards a fuller being" resonates profoundly with Indian philosophical and spiritual traditions, providing a crucial lens to enrich the module:

 

• Indian Holism (Pancha Kosha, Purusharthas): Indian thought (e.g., Vedanta, Yoga) emphasizes the integral nature of the human person. Models like the Pancha Kosha (five sheaths – Annamaya/Physical, Pranamaya/Vital, Manomaya/Mental, Vijnanamaya/Intellectual/Wisdom, and Anandamaya/Bliss/Spiritual) explicitly recognize that spiritual growth (moksha or ānanda) is inseparable from the healthy development and integration of the physical, energetic, mental, and intellectual dimensions. The Purusharthas (Dharma - ethics, Artha - material well-being, Kama - relational/emotional fulfillment, Moksha - liberation) similarly frame human flourishing as encompassing all aspects of life, not just the transcendent.

 

• Connecting to Formation: A truly ‘transformative Christian formation’ module must adopt this holistic vision:
• Physical: Honouring the body as God's temple (1 Cor 6:19-20), promoting health, stewardship, and embodied practices (prayer postures, disposition, service).
• Mental/Intellectual (Manomaya/Vijnanamaya): Cultivating wisdom, discernment, critical thinking, and engagement with Scripture, theology, science, and culture.
• Emotional/Psychological (Manomaya): Developing emotional intelligence, resilience, healing from wounds, fostering healthy relationships, managing desires (kama rightly ordered).
• Spiritual (Anandamaya): Deepening prayer, contemplation, sacramental life, experience of God's love, leading to inner freedom (ānanda) and compassionate action.

 

• Fuller Being, Man and Woman: This holistic approach acknowledges that men and women, in their God-given distinctiveness, reciprocity and equality, are called to this integrated growth. Formation nurtures the unique gifts and callings of each towards the fullness of their humanity within their specific contexts and relationships, contributing to the renewal of the world as a whole.

Recommendations for the Personal Growth Module

 

1. Reframe the Language: Shift emphasis from potentially dualistic "transformation" language to concepts like "Incarnational Formation," "Renewal within Creation," "Integral Discipleship," or "Holistic Human Growth." Ground all discussion firmly in the Incarnation and the "yeast" metaphor.
2. Explicitly Reject Dualism: Include a section critiquing world-escaping theologies (Gnosticism, excessive apocalyptic withdrawal) and affirming the goodness of creation and our embodied existence.
3. Centre Holistic Development: Structure the module around the integrated formation of the whole person (physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual), explicitly drawing on frameworks like the Pancha Kosha or Purusharthas as valuable cross-cultural insights that align with a biblical anthropology. Address gender specifically within this holistic context.
4. Emphasize Cultural Engagement: Focus on how formation equips believers to understand, critically engage, and positively influence their surrounding social cultures from a position of faithful presence within them.
5. Incorporate Embodied Practices: Include practical disciplines that integrate body, mind, and spirit (prayer, yoga, walks, mindful service, examen that includes emotional awareness, study that engages intellect and heart).

 

Conclusion

The "Transformative Formation" module holds potential but risks perpetuating a subtle spiritual dualism through its core terminology. True Christian formation is not a trans-forming as one out of the world but a profound renewal within it. It aims at the flourishing of our full humanity – physical, mental, emotional, psychological, and spiritual – as exemplified by Christ. By embracing a truly incarnational and holistic vision, deeply resonant with Indian perspectives on integrated human development, the module can more faithfully reflect the biblical mandate: to be the transformative "yeast" fully present within the "dough" of God's world, working towards its renewal and the glory of the Creator who dwells with us. Formation is for the sake of a fuller humanity here and now, participating in God's ongoing work of making all things new within creation.

 

ASCENT TO A LASTING LIFE

 

Leaving the Mountaintop and Entering the Mission

As the Church celebrated the solemn feast of the Ascension yesterday, we were once again invited into a profound mystery—one that is often misunderstood, romanticized, or glossed over. The image of the disciples standing on the Mount of Olives, eyes lifted to the sky as Jesus ascends into the heavens, is captivating. Their posture is one of awe and confusion—a combination of wonder at what they are witnessing and an aching sense of farewell. The sight of the glorified Christ rising to the Father must have left them spellbound. And yet, almost immediately, two heavenly figures interrupt their gaze with a startling directive: “Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into the sky?” The message is clear: do not remain here. Go. Move. Act.

This command is at the heart of the Church’s mission. Evangelization is not a spectator sport. It requires “boots on the ground,” feet planted in the messy soil of human experience. The Ascension is not the end of Jesus’ story—it is the continuation of it through us. It is the moment when the Church is given her marching orders: to go back into the world, proclaim the Gospel, and participate in God’s ongoing work of redemption.

Theological Clarity amid Confusion

There is, admittedly, a good deal of confusion surrounding the Ascension. Too often it is treated as Jesus “disappearing” into the sky, as if Heaven were a place located somewhere up above the clouds. Ignorance acts as bliss. Let us be clear and be grounded.

But to understand the Ascension theologically, we must first remember who Jesus is. The Trinitarian God ­– Father, Son, Spirit, existed from eternity. The Son took human nature and was both fully divine and fully man. The eternal Son, consubstantial with the Father and the Spirit, entered our world through the Incarnation—taking on human nature in the womb of Mary. Of course, the Spirit did not contribute what a human father normally does. This has nothing to do with biology. His bodily Resurrection and subsequent Ascension are not a return to a purely “spiritual” existence, but rather the elevation of human nature itself into divine glory. The human Jesus is a new creation, and in the Ascension, that new creation is welcomed into the very heart of the Trinity.

This is no mere metaphor. It is the core of Christian hope: that our humanity has been taken up into God. And so the Ascension is not a withdrawal of God from the world, but rather a transformation of how God is now present. Jesus no longer walks beside us in the flesh, but through the Spirit, he lives within us. We are not simply ‘outsiders’ begging God for help—we are friends, sons, and daughters. The life of the Trinity has been opened to us. We pray from within God’s own life.

The Spirit and the Mission

The Ascension sets the stage for Pentecost. Jesus departs bodily so that he may send the Spirit—God’s love poured out upon creation in a radically new way. The Spirit-water, as St. Cyril of Jerusalem terms, which takes the form of that which it enters in, while remaining always uniform in essence,  hovers once again over the ‘waters’ of chaos, not to create the world as in Genesis, but to renew it from within. We All – living and non-living- are one with the divine. This outpouring of divine life is not generic; it is personal, historical, and mission-oriented.

We are part of a Church born from this Spirit. Evangelization is not just a program or strategy—it is participation in this divine movement. In the Gospel, Jesus prays for our unity with him and for us to be immersed in God’s love. As Jesus prayed, “that the love with which you loved me may be in them, and I in them” (John 17:26), we realize that we are immersed in this love, drawn into the very relationship that defines God: Father, Son, and Spirit. To evangelize, then, is not just to speak about God, but to radiate God, to be so united to Christ that we carry his presence into the world.

Duc in Altum: Go Out into the Deep

The mystery of the ascension is a continuation of this evolving new creation. In light of this, the call to Duc in altum—“Go out into the deep”—resonates even more. Evangelization requires boldness. It demands creativity. In a world increasingly disillusioned with religion, increasingly secularized and skeptical, the Church is called not to retreat but to go further, to cast her nets deeper. As we continue to live and celebrate this creative process, we have an exclusive new gift of the Spirit of God, hovering over the entire creation freely choosing to support the future of the universe with all its mankind with compassion and generosity of human collaborators. The increasing secularized culture and the world’s seismic drift away from faith and religion calls us to do more. This means embracing new forms of communication—creative narratives, films, digital platforms—to proclaim the truth, beauty, and goodness of the Gospel. But more importantly, it means making a gift of ourselves. The Ascension reminds us that Jesus gave his all, holding nothing back. Will we do the same? Will we support this mission with our prayers, our resources, and our very lives?

From Ego-Drama to Theo-Drama

There is a deeper cultural shift we must contend with. Bishop Barron rightly distinguishes between the ego-drama and the Theo-drama. The ego-drama is our own story, one in which we are the star, the director, the producer. This is the dominant narrative of our age: be who you want to be, create your own truth, follow your desires. But the Ascension invites us into the Theo-drama—the great story authored by God, the drama of salvation history in which each of us has a unique and irreplaceable role.

Mary exemplifies this beautifully. When she received her divine mission from Gabriel, she did not hesitate. She rose “in haste” to visit Elizabeth—not just out of politeness, but because she had found her role in the divine story. She needed to share the joy. She was propelled forward by grace. Like Mary, we too must rise “with haste” and step into our mission—to carry Christ to others, especially in the socio-political and cultural arenas of our time.

Living the Mystery

The mystery of the Ascension is not an escape from the world but a call into it. Jesus ascends not to abandon us but to empower us. He departs so that we can become his body, his ‘limbs’ (St. Theresa of Avila) animated by his Spirit, continuing his mission on earth.

In a time of uncertainty and increasing secular disaffection, we are tempted to look longingly into the skies, hoping for divine intervention. But the angels’ message remains: “Why do you stand here looking up?” We must go. We must return to the city, to the streets, to our families, our schools, our media, and our governments. That is where the Theo-drama unfolds.

The Ascension is not about absence but an ascent to a higher living. It’s about presence—transformed, universal, and empowering. Christ is not gone. He is closer than ever. The question is: are we ready to move with him from within? Like Mary, can we too be in haste to take up our roles in the great story of salvation?